Today's Headlines

1. Smart glasses highlight gaps in privacy laws

Source: The Hindu Tech | Read Original →

The growing prevalence of advanced wearable technology, such as smart glasses, is posing significant challenges to existing privacy frameworks, making bans impractical and necessitating smarter legal responses. This article argues that laws must evolve to understand how AI-driven wearables continuously collect data, impacting individuals' privacy and highlighting potential blind spots in current data protection definitions. For businesses, this flags future considerations regarding personal data collection (Section 2(k)) and consent mechanisms (Section 6) in a world where data capture is increasingly ambient and passive.

2. Can a Company Use Its Brand Name Instead of Its Registered Name in a Privacy Policy? - Legal Wires

Source: Google News DPDP | Read Original →

This article delves into the critical question of whether a company's privacy policy can feature its brand name rather than its legally registered entity name. Under the DPDP Act, Section 7 (Notice) mandates that Data Fiduciaries provide clear information to Data Principals, including "the identity of the Data Fiduciary." Using a brand name exclusively could potentially obscure the true legal entity responsible for data processing, leading to ambiguity and complicating Data Principals' ability to exercise their rights or seek redress.

Stay Compliant

Not sure if your business meets DPDP standards? Start with a free check:

🔍 Run Your Free DPDP Audit →

16 questions. 60 seconds. Instant risk report.

---

Published by DPDP News, a Meridian Bridge Strategy initiative. For compliance consulting, book a free call.